Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15888
Plaintiff:
JAMES WINGFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Wingfield v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Defendant:
FNU Harr, FNU Bolstick, FNU Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wingfield v. Warden, USP Coleman 1
as 5:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
James Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wingfield v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03976
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11381
Plaintiff:
Aaron Monroe, James Wingfield, James Eagle and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
HIGHSMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01186
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BROWN, JONATHAN HESS, JAMES WINGFIELD and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Highsmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00975
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown, Jonathan Hess, James Wingfield and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Wingfield v. Hobbs
as 5:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
