Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reinard SmithIn re: Reinard Smith
as 22-1368
Petitioner:
In re: REINARD SMITH
Respondent:
ALEX KERSHENTSEF, KEY & V AUTO SALES, VLAD and others
DOE2 v. DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 3:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE2
Defendant:
DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, DENISE FOSTER, WALTER BUCKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00204
Defendant:
NYPD Detective Andrew Berkowitz, Paul Ochea, Jane Doe2 and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinard Smith v. Alex Kershentsef, et al
as 19-3893
Defendant / Appellee:
KEY & V AUTO SALES, ALEX KERSHENTSEF, MIKE, (JOHN DOE) and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, SIANIS TOWING and STEWART KISSINGER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REINARD SMITH
Solares-Gonzaga v. Essen22 LLC et al
as 1:2018cv06175
Defendant:
100 Broad Street LLC, Angie Park, John Byun and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Solares-Gonzaga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doe1 et al v. Boston Public Schools et al
as 1:2017cv11653
Plaintiff:
John Doe1 , Jane Doe1 , John Doe2 and others
Defendant:
Boston Public Schools , City of Boston , Tommy Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lapin v. Widmyer et al
as 2:2017cv00304
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lapin
Defendant:
Steven D Widmyer , Jane Doe 1 Widmyer , William T Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cooke v. 'Doe' et al
as 6:2017cv00825
Defendant:
Regina 'Doe', Zig 'Doe', Jane Doe2 and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
