Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
CADMUS v. CHECKR, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03459
Defendant: CHECKR, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff: RICHARD R. CADMUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO v. HUDSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01230
Plaintiff: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
Defendant: EUGENE HUDSON, JR. , DANA DUGGINS and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERLMUTTER et al v. VARONE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01872
Plaintiff: DAWN PERLMUTTER and THOMAS M. BOLICK
Defendant: TRINA VARONE , JEFFREY VARONE , GARY ALTMAN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. FLAGSTAR BANK et al
as 1:2012cv01556
Plaintiff: STERLING HARRIS
Defendant: FLAGSTAR BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HOPPMAN et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv01252
Plaintiff: DAVID C. HOPPMAN and WENDY GILLETTE HOPPMAN
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, SHAPIRO AND BURSON, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
CHANG et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv02010
Plaintiff: RAYMING CHANG , AMY CHASTAIN , YOUNG CHOI and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Cross_claimant: FAIRFAX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cross_defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
AMADI V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL.,
as 1:2008cv00111
Plaintiff: OKECHUKWU MUMMEE AMADI
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?