Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Sharon Lee v. Argent Trust Company
as 19-2485
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHARON LEE
Defendant / Appellee: MEMBERS OF THE CHOATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BOARD OF DIRECTORS (JOHN AND JANE DOES 11-20), SELLING SHAREHOLDERS (JOHN AND JANE DOES 21-35), MEMBERS OF THE CHOATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ESOP COMMITTEE (JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10) and others
Ashley Prior v. State of South Carolina
as 19-7381
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN B. MCCREE, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, SCDC Kirkland Staff, SHERIFF OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASHLEY T. PRIOR
Ortagus Bennett v. Randy Smith
as 19-2055
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN GARRETT, in his individual and representative capacity as a agent for the US Drug Enforcement Agency, JAMES & JOAN DOE 1-10, in their individual and representative capacities Agents of the State of South Carolina Law Enforcement Agencies, JOHN & JANE DOES 1 - 10, DEA agents in their individual and representative capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ORTAGUS DEMETRICE BENNETT
Cynthia Glenn v. Melissa Marsh
as 19-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant: CYNTHIA GLENN
Defendant / Appellee: JANE DOES 1-20, ROBERT CLARK, BRITTANY VAN DE GOHM and others
Plaintiff: MARK GUION
Jeffrey Quatrone v. Gannett Company, Inc.
as 19-1212
Defendant / Appellee: THE GANNETT BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE, GANNETT COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFREY QUATRONE, on Behalf of Gannett Co., Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan and all other similiar situated, JEFFREY QUATRONE, on Behalf of Gannett Co., Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan and all others similiarly situated
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Appellant: CHRISTINA STEGEMANN
Mark Weiner v. Albemarle County, Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1210
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK L. WEINER
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT TRACCI, in his official capacity as Albemarle County Commonwealth's Attorney
Defendant: DENISE Y. LUNSFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOES, Nos. 1-10, ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Ronald Barranco v. 3D Systems Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1744
Plaintiff - Appellee: RONALD BARRANCO, PRINT3D CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
Defendant - Appellant: 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, DAMON GREGOIRE, 3D SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation and others
Defendant: DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
Fredicia Hardnett v. M&T Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDICIA HARDNETT, WILBERT A. HARDNETT
Defendant - Appellee: M&T BANK, ATLANTIC LAW GROUP, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Janet Hodgin v. UTC Fire & Security America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1222
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDITH BOWLER, JANET HODGIN, MICHAEL HODGIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: JAMES G. HOUGH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KERRY O'SHEA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, GEORGE CAIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORP., INC., ALLIANCE SECURITY, INC., d/b/a AH Security, Inc, formerly doing business as Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc., d/b/a VMS Alarms and others
Defendant: VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a VMS Alarms, d/b/a VMS Alliance Security, d/b/a Alliance Home Protection, LISA HADDAD, d/b/a CCA Services LLC, d/b/a Alarmillinois.com, d/b/a Alarmindiana.com, DOES 1-10 and others
Party-in-Interest: COMPLIANCEPOINT, INC.
Rhonda Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2443
Plaintiff - Appellant: RHONDA MEISNER
Defendant - Appellee: ZYMOGENETICS INCORPORATED, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc, ZYMOGENETICS LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zymogenetics, Inc, BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, INC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?