Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Janet Hodgin v. UTC Fire & Security America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1222
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDITH BOWLER, JANET HODGIN, MICHAEL HODGIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: JAMES G. HOUGH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KERRY O'SHEA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, GEORGE CAIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORP., INC., ALLIANCE SECURITY, INC., d/b/a AH Security, Inc, formerly doing business as Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc., d/b/a VMS Alarms and others
Defendant: VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a VMS Alarms, d/b/a VMS Alliance Security, d/b/a Alliance Home Protection, LISA HADDAD, d/b/a CCA Services LLC, d/b/a Alarmillinois.com, d/b/a Alarmindiana.com, DOES 1-10 and others
Party-in-Interest: COMPLIANCEPOINT, INC.
Rhonda Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2443
Plaintiff - Appellant: RHONDA MEISNER
Defendant - Appellee: ZYMOGENETICS INCORPORATED, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc, ZYMOGENETICS LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zymogenetics, Inc, BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, INC and others
Raina Connor v. Tavares Thompson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1353
Plaintiff - Appellee: RAINA CONNOR, Administratrix of the Estate of Adam Wade Carter
Defendant - Appellant: TAVARES THOMPSON, in his official and individual capacities, WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF DONNIE HARRISON, in his official and individual capacities and THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: XYZ CORPORATION, in its capacity as Surety on the official bond of the Sheriff of Wake County, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, individually and in their official capacities as Deputy Sheriffs of Wake County, WAKE COUNTY and others
John Nell v. Wieland Financial Services LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1350
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN A. NELL and REBECCA I. NELL, wife
Defendant - Appellee: WIELAND FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC, NORTHSTAR MORTGAGE GROUP LLC, JOHN WIELAND and others
Arthur Gooden, II v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2483
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR LEE GOODEN, II
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Tech Systems, Inc. v. Lovelen Pyle
as 13-2098
Plaintiff - Appellee: TECH SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: LOVELEN PYLES
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Torrie Johnson v. Baltimore City Police Dept We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant: TORRIE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FREDERICK BEALEFELD, Police Commissioner Individually and as Police Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department, ADAM LONG, Police Officer, Sequence #F648 Individually and as a Police Officer of the Baltimore City Police Department and others
Shawn Massey v. J. Ojaniit We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHAWN MASSEY
Defendant - Appellee: J. J. OJANIIT, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer, GERALD ESPOSITO, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer, TOM G. LEDFORD, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer and others
Tech Systems, Inc. v. Lovelen Pyle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1359
Plaintiff - Appellee: TECH SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: LOVELEN PYLES
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Marcus Mial v. Jennifer Sherin
as 12-1901
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARCUS MIAL
Defendant - Appellant: JENNIFER SHERIN, BRIAN SAYRE, NATHAN FERGUSON and others
Defendant: STEPHEN O. SIMPSON, In his official capacity as Sheriff and DEPUTIES JOHN AND JANE DOES ##1-10, In their individual capacities

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?