Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc. v. Anne Ryan, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Designer Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant:
Anne Ryan, L.L.C. , Robert Davin Shaw , Michelle E. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jane Envy, LLC v. Leemode International, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04505
Plaintiff:
Jane Envy, LLC
Defendant:
Leemode International, Inc. and Woo Ick Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jane Envy, LLC v. Infinite Classic Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00083
Defendant:
Infinite Classic Inc. and Baek H. Kim
Plaintiff:
Jane Envy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jane Envy, LLC v. Best Imports & Wholesale, LLC
as 5:2014cv00081
Defendant:
Best Imports & Wholesale, LLC, Roger Hun Kang and Mo Kyung Lee
Plaintiff:
Jane Envy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jane Envy LLC v. Sole International Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00071
Defendant:
Byung Jo Cha, Chang Han Ryu and Sole International Inc
Plaintiff:
Jane Envy LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jane Envy, LLC v. Sam Moon Trading Enterprises, Ltd. et al
as 5:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jane Envy, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel S Moon, David Moon, Samuel S Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jane Envy, LLC v. J'sWorld Trading Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00066
Defendant:
Eul S Cho, Yoo S Cho and J'sWorld Trading Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane Envy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sophia & Chloe, Inc. v. Jane Envy, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Sophia & Chloe, Inc.
Defendant:
Jane Envy, LLC and Running Wild Wholesale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
VSA Designs, Inc. v. Anne Ryan LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03932
Plaintiff:
VSA Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Anne Ryan LLC, Arabella Imports, LLC, Davin Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
