Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
St. Pierre v. King et al
as 1:2019cv03629
Defendant: D. Wolf and Janet King
Plaintiff: Randall St. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. King et al
as 1:2019cv04856
Plaintiff: John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant: Magistrate Judge Janet King, Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield, III and Magistrate Judge Gerrilyn G. Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant: Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff: Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. Com Cor Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02171
Defendant: El Paso County Jail, Criminal Justice Center, Janet King, Donna and others
Plaintiff: Howard Lavonne Lee Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. ComCor Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01802
Defendant: ComCor Inc, Trinity Food Services, Peter Lichtman and others
Plaintiff: Howard Abram and Howard Lavonne Lee Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. King
as 1:2019cv01678
Defendant: Janet King
Plaintiff: Jackie-DeVere Allen Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. CJC et al
as 1:2019cv01649
Defendant: Janet King, CJC, Liz O'Neal and others
Plaintiff: Howard Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beddingfield v. Elder, et al
as 19-1199
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER BEDDINGFIELD
Defendant / Appellee: BILL ELDER, Sheriff and JANET KING, Programs Manager, Cmndr(s), Cptn(s), Lt(s), Deputy(s), John Does', Doe
KING v. CLUBB et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv11317
Plaintiff: JANET KING
Defendant: MICHAEL CLUBB, AIM INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. and AIM LEASING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beddingfield v. Elder et al
as 1:2018cv01900
Plaintiff: Christopher Beddingfield
Defendant: Bill Elder, Cptn(s), Lt(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?