Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Martin, et al v. Office of Personnel
as 23-1230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANET MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Martin v. Office of Personnel Mgmt
as 1:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
Janet Martin
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Office of Personnel Mgmt and Social Security Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin et al v. Oldham Co. P.V.A. et al
as 3:2019cv00894
Defendant:
Milton Stoess, School Board, Oldham Co. P.V.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Martin and Eric Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv62216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Martin v. Shannon et al
as 3:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Valerie Shannon, Oldham County Clerk and Oldham Property Valuation Administration
Plaintiff:
Janet Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nale et al v. City of Georgetown IL et al
as 2:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
Shelly F. Nale and Melissa J. bowles
Defendant:
City of Georgetown IL, Kay Sanders, Carl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nale et al v. City of Georgetown et al
as 2:2014cv02078
Plaintiff:
Shelly F Nale and Melissa J Bowles
Defendant:
City of Georgetown, Kay Sanders, Carl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Lane Community College et al
as 6:2012cv01633
Defendant:
Lane Community College, Janet Martin and Katherin Vos, OR
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03461
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
