Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Harris #113830 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2025cv00566
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Kris Mayes and Anthony Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris #113830 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2025cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-7873
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Kristen and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Harris #113830 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01919
Defendant:
Unknown Espinoza, Unknown Luna and Ryan Thornell
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris #113830 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01905
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
Paul Penzone, Kristin K Mayes and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jason Harris v. County of Maricopa
as 23-15105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA
Jason Harris v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 23-15037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
