Cases 1 - 10 of 29
BISSONETTE v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF KEVIN JOYCE et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF KEVIN JOYCE, MATTHEW GLAZER, EDIE WOODWARD and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE BISSONETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Simpson v. Parker Co. Appraisal District et al
as 4:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
James Jason Simpson
Defendant:
Parker Co. Appraisal District and Rick Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17767
Plaintiff:
JASON SIMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson et al v. Sunbeam Products, Inc
as 9:2022cv81887
Plaintiff:
Heather Simpson and Jason Simpson
Defendant:
Sunbeam Products, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87566
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03907
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIGNORELLO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03246
Plaintiff:
CHADWICK SPARKS, CHILL TANNER, ANDREW SLYWZCUK and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, 3M COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Signorello et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02214
Plaintiff:
Aearo Intermediate, LLC, Chadwick Sparks, Chill Tanner and others
Defendant:
Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
