Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pioneer GP Limited v. Valdez
as 23-1121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pioneer GP Limited and Champlain Investment Holdings Limited
Defendant / Appellee:
Daria Valdez, AKA Daria Pastoukhova and Jason Sweeney
Pioneer GP Limited et al v. Valdez et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Pioneer GP Limited and CHAMPLAIN INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LIMITED
Defendant:
DARIA VALDEZ a/k/a DARIA PASTOUKHOVA, JASON SWEENEY, Daria Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Estate of Eric C Olsen v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2021cv01457
Plaintiff:
Estate of Eric C. Olsen and Estate of Eric C Olsen
Defendant:
Officer Jason Sweeney, Officer Eric Anderson, Town of Geneva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94670
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROSIGHT SYNDICATE 1110 at Lloyds and IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARKS et al
as 1:2018cv23849
Defendant:
FRANK VALDEZ, NORTH AMERICAN ELITE INSURANCE COMPANY as underwriter for SWISS RE, a New Hampshire Corporation, DARIA PASTOUKHOVA GOGOLEVA, individually and as the natural parent and legal guardian of the minor children A.P.V., N.M.P.V., and L.P.V., and as the Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF LANCE VALD and others
Plaintiff:
PROSIGHT SYNDICATE 1110 at Lloyds and IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lillard v. Sweeney
as 3:2017cv01101
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lillard
Defendant:
Jason Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. PRETTI et al
as 2:2015cv06234
Plaintiff:
JASON SWEENEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. PRETTI and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brito v. Cumberland County Prison
as 3:2015cv01641
Plaintiff:
Santiago DeJesus Brito
Defendant:
Jason Sweeney and Jonathan Leuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
