Cases 11 - 20 of 55
BROWN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BROWN
Defendant:
JASON CARTER and KELLY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGEE et al v. CARTER et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
NANCY McGEE, TROY McGEE and A.M.
Defendant:
JASON CARTER and THE ARMS TRUCKING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
GOLD et al v. CARTER et al
as 2:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY GOLD and AMIEE GOLD
Defendant:
JASON CARTER and THE ARMS TRUCKING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
BROWN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BROWN
Defendant:
JASON CARTER and KELLY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSHING v. WILLIAM et al
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. RUSHING
Defendant:
PATRICIA WILLIAM, JASON CARTER, CENTURIUN MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSEN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01837
Plaintiff:
LARRY DALE BUSEN
Defendant:
JASON CARTER and NURSES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, KAY WILKS, M.D., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson v. Schlumberger et al
as 5:2022cv00336
Defendant:
Schlumberger, Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Lizette Bouddhou and others
Plaintiff:
James Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Maximo Gomez v. Steven Lister, et al
as 22-10808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN W. LISTER, JASON CARTER, SLATER WILLIAMS and others
POSYTON, III v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
RONALD POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD, JASON CARTER and DOES 1-Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
