Cases 1 - 10 of 25
GREENE v. HARRISON et al
as 7:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDREW TYRELL GREENE and Asad Zay Bey
Defendant:
ADA MICHELLE T HARRISON, DA BRADFIELD SHEALY, SHERRIFF ASHLEY PAULK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. PAULK et al
as 7:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
ROBERT EUGENE SIMMONS and ROBERT EUGENE SIMMONS, JR
Respondent:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK, Probation Officer ROUNDTREE, Probation Officer MICHELLE CLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYD v. PAULK et al
as 7:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
GARETH COY BOYD
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK and Captain JASON CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUDLEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMARIE DUDLEY
Defendant:
ASHLEY PAULK, CAPTAIN JASON CLIFTON, MR MATTHEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
GARETH COY BOYD
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK, JASON CLIFTON and ROBERT PICCIOTTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINSEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
JAMELLE W KINSEY
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK and Captain JASON CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENDER v. CLIFTON et al
as 7:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
RONALD FENDER
Defendant:
JASON CLIFTON and HARDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLIFTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50039
Plaintiff:
JASON CLIFTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COWART v. PAULK et al
as 7:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JULIUS COWART
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Captain JASON CLIFTON, Staff Sergeant SWAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamie Shontz v. Jason Clifton
as 20-13600
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON CLIFTON, Captain, Lawndes County Jail
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIE STEVEN SHONTZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
