Cases 1 - 10 of 18
State of Alabama v. Pugh
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Jason Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Removal of Civil/Criminal Action from State Court
Pugh v. McCovery
as 1:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
Jason Pugh
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia McCovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pugh v. McCovery
as 1:2022cv00323
Petitioner:
Jason Pugh
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia McCovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jamison v. Winston Choctaw County Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Jason Pugh, Neal Higgason, Deputy Warden Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08791
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON PUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynda T Buil et al v. John Spencer et al
as 5:2018cv01094
Defendant:
.40 Caliber Management Services, LLC, APE Global, LLC, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Linda T Bui
In Re Debtor:
Metropolitan Automotive Warehouse, Inc. and Star Auto Parts, Inc
Montgomery v. Loper et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Stanley Montgomery (DO NOT FILE)
Defendant:
Joseph H. Loper, Jr., Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGinnis v. Pugh et al
as 1:2014cv00207
Plaintiff:
Cedrick McGinnis
Defendant:
Jason Pugh, Neal Higgason, Theresa Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Winston County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Rush
Defendant:
Winston County Sheriff Department, Kim James, Jason Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Winston County, MS et al
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
James Lee
Defendant:
Winston County, MS, Jason Pugh, Tim Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
