Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Ramirez
as 21-50303
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Ramirez, also known as Jose Raul Ramirez, also known as Jason Andrew Ramirez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91248
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56207
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tonya Washington v. Franchise Tax Board et al
as 5:2015cv01254
Defendant:
Jozel Brunett, Jozel Brunett, County of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Tonya Washington
Mark Phelps v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-17071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, JASON RAMIREZ, DAVID STINSON and others
Phelps v. Cate et al
as 1:2013at00904
Plaintiff:
Mark Phelps
Defendant:
Matthew Cate , jason ramirez , David Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps v. Cate et al
as 1:2013cv02087
Plaintiff:
Mark Phelps
Defendant:
Matthew Cate , Jason Ramirez , David Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wisconsin Carry, Inc. et al v. City Of Madison, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Carry, Inc. , Frank Hannan Rock , Matthew Lutz and others
Defendant:
City of Madison, Wisconsin , Jason Ramirez, Bernie Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suarez v. New Enrico's Car Service Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv09729
Plaintiff:
Jaime Suarez
Defendant:
New Enrico's Car Service Corp. and Jason Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
