Cases 1 - 10 of 41
27 Phoenix LLC et al v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv01114
Plaintiff:
27 Phoenix LLC and Jaspreet Singh Gill
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
SINGH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2025cv01955
Plaintiff:
JASPREET SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KRISTI NOEM and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Poole v. Singh et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poole
Defendant:
Jaspreet Singh, Rai Trans Carrier, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Singh v. Skifstad et al
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jaspreet Singh
Defendant:
Globemax Express, Inc. and Jeffrey Skifstad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Torres v. Khaira
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Edward Torres
Defendant:
Jaspreet Singh Khaira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Singh et al
as 1:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Evan Michael Hoffman
Defendant:
Ghotra Jaspreet Singh and Star Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh v. Garland
as 23-7132
Petitioner:
JASPREET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
