Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Morales-Maldonado, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3261
Petitioner:
KRISTIAN JAVIER MORALES-MALDONADO, MELISSA JOSELYN CASTILLO-ESCOTO and KRISTIAN JAVIER MORALES-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
CASTILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49215
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER ALEXIS CASTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Castillo
as 2:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Javier A. Castillo
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Javier Castillo Castillo v. William Barr
as 19-71665
Petitioner:
JAVIER FRANCISCO CASTILLO CASTILLO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Gonzalez Ocque et al v. Castillo Melendez
as 1:2019cv20025
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Gonzalez Ocque, Adriana Pineiro and Luis Miguel Gonzalez Ocque
Respondent:
Javier Alejandro Castillo Melendez
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Javier Castillo-Romero v. USA
as 18-11735
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAVIER ENRIQUE CASTILLO-ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Castillo-Romero v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv00741
Plaintiff:
Javier Enrique Castillo-Romero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Castillo
as 2:2017cv00031
Defendant:
Javier A. Castillo
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Javier Castillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73866
Petitioner:
JAVIER E. CASTILLO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ramos et al v. Conway et al
as 6:2012cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jovanny Diaz Ramos , Jose Alberto Ramirez and Javier Enriquez Castillo
Defendant:
Jacqueline S Conway, Hartt Transportation Systems Inc and CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
