Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Musiala, Jr. v. Doshi et al
as 1:2025cv00638
Plaintiff:
Robert A Musiala, Jr.
Defendant:
Vatsal Doshi, Joshua Gibson, Jasveer Grewal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sampson v. Crothall Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06448
Plaintiff:
Falon Sampson
Defendant:
Jay Patel, Lizzy Urbina and Crothall Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Stump et al v. MAKANJI & SONS, LLC
as 6:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stump and Robert Ford
Defendant:
MAKANJI & SONS, LLC d/b/a CLASSIC INN MOTEL, ANKIT JITENDRA BHAKTA, HARSHABEN J. BHAKTA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Patel et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Rakeshkumar Patel, Urmilaben Patel and Jay Patel
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
