Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Musgrove et al v. Blades et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Defendant: Brad Little, Scott Brow, Dave Dietz and others
Plaintiff: Theodore E Musgrove and Jay Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sivak v. Christensen
as 24-3384
Petitioner: LACEY SIVAK
Respondent: JAY CHRISTENSEN
Passons v. Christensen
as 23-3820
Petitioner / Appellant: RUSSELL ALLEN PASSONS
Respondent / Appellee: JAY CHRISTENSEN
Sivak v. Winmill, et al.
as 23-1638
Not Yet Classified: ID ISCI LIBRARIAN
Plaintiff / Appellant: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee: Judge B. LYNN WINMILL, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge DAVID C. NYE, DISTRICT JUDGE, M. DOUGLAS HARPOOL and others
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 23-35453
Petitioner / Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee: JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70070
Not Classified By Court: In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK, B. LYNN WINMILL, Judge, DAVID C. NYE, Judge and others
Petitioner: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff: Jody Carr
Defendant: Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff: Cody Willard
Defendant: Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff: Scott Stone
Defendant: Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Sivak v. Thomas, I.S.C.C. Security, et al
as 23-35278
Plaintiff / Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS, I.S.C.C. SECURITY, JAPHET, I.S.C.C. SECURITY, SGT. I.S.C.C. SECURITY BEARD and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?