Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Hall v. United States
as 23-60018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arizona Hall, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, John Does, Phil Bryant, State of Mississippi, Governor and others
Arizona HallIn re: Arizona Hall
as 22-60671
Petitioner:
In re: Arizona Hall, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America, John Does, Phil Bryant, State of Mississippi Governor and others
Hall v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Arizona Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, John Does, Phil Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diane Perkins, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 21-2223
Defendant / Appellee:
7 unnamed KCMO Police Officers, Michael L. Parson, Joel Elmer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Diane E. Perkins, authorized representative of Reginald Allen Perkins, deceased
Plaintiff:
Reginald Perkins, Deceased
Troy Williams v. Doe, et al
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Phone Company Tycoon, Jay Nixon, Former Missouri Governor, Donald W. Hinton, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Williams
Gregory Donald v. Jeremiah Nixon
as 20-1722
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeremiah W.(Jay) Nixon and Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory L. Donald
Donald v. Nixon
as 4:2019cv01037
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Donald
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. NBA et al
as 4:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Lindsey
Defendant:
NBA, NFL Players Association, Mayor James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. Frmr. Missouri Governor Jay Nixon
as 3:2017cv05110
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Frmr. Missouri Governor Jay Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Donald et al v. Nixon et al
as 4:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Donald and Tina M Donald
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Todd M. Schultz and Jackson County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
