Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sangster v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02982
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, W. Steve Albrecht, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Sangster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Carlson v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01879
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, W. Steve Albrecht, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Carlson
JUSTICE v. CORELOGIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01542
Defendant:
CLAUDIA FAN MUNCE, W. STEVE ALBRECHT, JAYNIE MILLER STUDENMUND and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kent v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund, Wendy Lane and others
Morgan v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00581
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Morse v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00770
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Irwin Morse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Stein v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01948
Defendant:
Claudia Fan Munce, Douglas C. Curling, Jaynie Miller Studenmund and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Bennett Anschutz v. Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc., et al
as 20-56222
Defendant / Appellee:
AYAD A. FARGO, M. CHRISTIAN MITCHELL, BARBARA S. POLSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENNETT ANSCHUTZ
Bennett Anschutt v. Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00650
Defendant:
JAYNIE MILLER STUDENMUND, M. CHRISTIAN MITCHELL, STEVEN R. GARDNER and others
Plaintiff:
BENNETT ANSCHUTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franchi v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00415
Defendant:
Charles L. Atwood, Stephen Comer, Ron Huberman and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
