Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Williams v. Baker et al
as 3:2011cv01043
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
M Baker, C/O Cheatam, Barbara Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. New et al
as 3:2011cv00918
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Misty New, Jack Ashby, Jeanette Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac Briggs v. Jeanette Cowan, et al
as 11-1422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC BRIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANETTE COWAN, JAMES M. RYAN, MAJOR INMAN and others
Shoemaker v. Krieg et al
as 3:2010cv01047
Plaintiff:
Tony Shoemaker
Defendant:
Dr Krieg, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Sarah Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordrey v. Rednour et al
as 3:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Cordrey
Defendant:
Dave Rednour, Assistant Warden Stack, William Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardaway v. Meyerhoff et al
as 3:2010cv00556
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hardaway
Defendant:
Bretta Meyerhoff, Charles Parnell, Jeanette Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Cowan et al
as 3:2010cv00502
Plaintiff:
Isaac Briggs
Defendant:
Jeanette Cowan, James M Ryan, Major Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Maue et al
as 3:2010cv00370
Plaintiff:
Corky Terry
Defendant:
Nathan Maue, Major Maue, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael F Miller
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr, Donald Hullick, Sherry Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Smith v. Danny Pender, et al
as 09-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DANNY PENDER, Corretional Officer, Sergeant Menard Correctional Center, JEANETTE COWAN, Grievance Office Supervisor, Menard Correctional Center, GARY L. CONDER, Assistant Warden of Programs, Menard Correctional Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
