Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Prescott (PS) v. T.D.C.J Corr. Officers et al
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
T.D.C.J Corr. Officers, Jeffery Catoe, Mathew Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 6:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron J. Pruitt, Daniel Choate, Homero Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron Pruitt, Homero Garza, Jeffrn Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. T.D.C.J Corr. Officers et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Daniel Choate, T.D.C.J Corr. Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott v. Catoe
as 23-40245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffery Catoe, Warden, Coffield Unit, Matthew Barber, Regional Director, Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and others
Hudgins v. Catoe
as 22-40155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isreal Hudgins
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffery Catoe, Jeffery Richardson, Michael McNeal and others
Prescott v. Catoe et al
as 4:2020cv00169
Defendant:
John Warren, Matthew Barber, Tim Wildman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peucker v. Catoe et al
as 6:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Deborah Roden, Annie Ivy, Rebecca Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Peucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peucker v. Abott et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Rebecca Cox, Leeroy Cano, Jeffery Catoe and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Peucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peucker v. Catoe et al
as 1:2020cv00064
Defendant:
Deborah Roden, Annie Ivy, Rebecca Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Andrew Peucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
