Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Anthony Cain v. Wellpath/CCS, et al
as 24-5224
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
WELLPATH/CCS, JEREMY NATIONS, LIEUTENANT KIERSTER and others
Jeffery Johnson v. Casey Kimbro, et al
as 24-5203
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CASEY KIMBRO, PREA CORD, OFFICER PISZNER, PREA CORD, CAPTAIN MIKE HOPKINS and others
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Jeffery Johnson v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 24-5198
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY JOHNSON, aka Anthony Cain
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, MARTHA DILMAGHANI, JOHN DOE #1, Aramark Dietician and others
Anthony Cain v. Calloway County Jail, et al
as 24-5188
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
CALLOWAY COUNTY JAIL, SHELIA PEEK, Nurse and CALLOWAY COUNTY, KY
Johnson v. Vermillion County Illinois
as 2:2023cv02226
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Vermilion County Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24955
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Vermillion County, Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv14122
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Vermillion County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03653
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Kimbro et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Casey Kimbro, Ofc Piszner, Captain Mike Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
