Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Cohen v. Arnold Scott Harris, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris, P.C., Harris & Harris, Ltd. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Dr. Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv08099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JTS Capital 3 LLC v. Rathskeller Holding, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
JTS Capital 3 LLC
Defendant:
Rathskeller Holding LLC, Craig Cohen, Jeffrey Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cohen v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv01304
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Cohen
Respondent:
Warden J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
