Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Supreme Born v. Jeffrey Dunn, et al
as 24-10580
Plaintiff:
SUPREME BORN
Defendant:
JEFFREY DUNN, Individually and in his Official Capacity, RANDALL SANDLIN, Individually and in his Official Capacity, WILLIE THOMAS and others
Brocato v. Ivey et al
as 5:2020cv01150
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey, Jeffrey Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Brocato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77449
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv02912
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sidorick et al v. Brilliant Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv08932
Defendant:
Brilliant Holdings, LLC, Ronald Gatehouse, Kelley Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Marian Sidorick and Stephen Sidorick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Johnson v. Lang et al
as 1:2018cv00349
Defendant:
Nurse Taylor, K. Lang, Nurse Wall and others
Plaintiff:
Jon L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01632
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jeffrey Dunn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dunn, Evon Creech and Kevin Haim, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunne v. Computerized Mudlogging Services, LLC
as 4:2015cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dunne
Defendant:
Computerized Mudlogging Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dunn et al v. Graham et al
as 3:2014cv01736
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dunn and Anna Dunn
Defendant:
James Graham and Pittston Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
