Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC
as 23-8035
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
GPB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, ASCENDANT CAPITAL, LLC, ASCENDANT ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID GENTILE
Securities and Exchange Commission v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC
as 23-8010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
GPB CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, ASCENDANT ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES, LLC and JEFFREY LASH
Defendant / Appellant:
ASCENDANT CAPITAL, LLC, JEFFRY SCHNEIDER and DAVID GENTILE
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00583
Defendant:
David Gentile, Jeffry Schneider, GPB Capital Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Interested Party:
Bohnenkamp Living Trust, Joseph T. Gardemal III and People Of The State Of New York
Intervenor:
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York
Amicus Curiae:
FSC Securities Corp.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Deluca et al v. GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP et al
as 1:2019cv10498
Plaintiff:
Drew R. Naylor, Barbara Deluca, Peggy Rollo and others
Defendant:
GPB Holdings II, LP, Axiom Capital Management, Inc., Mark Martino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Lash v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05622
Defendant:
David Gentile, GPB Holdings Automotive, LLC, GPB Holdings, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lash v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05622
Defendant:
David Gentile, GPB Holdings Automotive, LLC, GPB Holdings, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
