Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Calvin Norton v. Kevin Tabron
as 17-2228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN TYRONE NORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN TABRON, in his personal capacity and his official capacity as S.B.I. Special Agent for the Coastal District of North Carolina, BRENNAN REGNER, in his personal capacity and his official capacity as S.B.I. Special Agent for the Coastal District of North Carolina, JONATHAN DAVID, a/k/a Jon David, in his personal capacity and his official capacity as District Attorney for the 13th Prosecutorial District of North Carolina and others
Calvin Tyrone Norton v. City of Whiteville
as 17-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN TYRONE NORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WHITEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, a Municipality, WHITEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, a department under the Municipality of City of Whiteville, TRACEY CARTER, Police Officer of Whiteville Police Department sued in her official and individually capacity and others
Norton v. City of Whiteville, et al
as 7:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Defendant:
City of Whiteville , Whiteville Police Department , Tracey Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Tabron, et al
as 7:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Defendant:
Kevin Tabron , Brennan Regner , Jonathan David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Tabron et al
as 7:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Defendant:
Kevin Tabron, Brennan Regner, Jonathan David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Norton v. Jeffrey Rosier
as 15-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN TYRONE NORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY ROSIER, in his individual capacity and CITY OF WHITEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Norton v. Rosier et al
as 7:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rosier and City of Whiteville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
