Cases 1 - 10 of 386
Kamara v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00743
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Brophy and others
Petitioner:
Mohamed Daramy Kamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mbunga v. Searls
as 6:2024cv06478
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Petitioner:
Felly Nzau Mbunga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diakhate v. Searls
as 24-1492
Petitioner:
CHEIKH LOUIS DIAKHATE
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, Facility Director of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Awuley v. Ball
as 6:2024cv06189
Petitioner:
Prince Awuley
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls and Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Casilla Rosario v. Searls
as 24-379
Petitioner:
ROBERT CASILLA ROSARIO
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, in his official capacity as Officer-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
