Cases 1 - 10 of 25
IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE WATROUS JR.
as 3:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Sjunde AP-Fonden and Metzler Asset Management GmbH
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Petitioner:
Apple, Inc., Jeffrey Williams and Bruce Watrous, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE WATROUS JR.
as 5:2023mc80181
Petitioner:
Apple Inc., Jeffrey Williams and Bruce Watrous, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Sjunde AP-Fonden, Metzler Asset Management GMBH and Qualcomm Incorporated
Demaree et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2022cv08772
Plaintiff:
Matthew Demaree, Alex Yohn, Berenger Lieber and others
Defendant:
Thomas Castro, Cyril Polizzi, Quentin Detraux and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. USA
as 21-20255
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Williams
Marco Amaral v. City of San Diego, et al
as 21-55420
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO and JEFFREY WILLIAMS, previously sued as FNU Williams, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCO AMARAL
USA v. Jeffrey Williams
as 20-14070
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Jeffrey Forget
as 20-10585
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY WILLIAM FORGET
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodney Hurdsman v. Kathleen Pokluda, et al
as 20-50102
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUCE VOISINE, MIKE GLEASON, Prior Chief, in their individual and official capacity, JULIAN VILLARREAL, Correctional Officer; in their individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RODNEY A. HURDSMAN
Jenkins v. Trueman et al
as 4:2019cv08350
Plaintiff:
Judith Jenkins
Defendant:
Alcove Medical, Inc., Jeffrey William Trueman, Jeff Bullock and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
