Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bishop v. Jones, et al.
as 23-3974
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES BISHOP, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
G JONES, Warden
Respondent:
JENA JONES
Jillson et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC, et al
as 3:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jillson, Jeremy Anderson, Clarissa Davis and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC d/b/a Praxis of South Bend by Landmark Recovery, Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC, Landmark Recovery Management Company, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Richard McDevitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Robert James Bishop Jr. v. Jena Jones
as 2:2023cv07298
Petitioner:
Robert James Bishop, Jr.
Respondent:
Jena Jones and G Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oates v. O'Hare et al
as 4:2018cv02589
Defendant:
Major Crow, Sgt. Cesenero, Asst. Warden LaCox and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Oates, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S. v. Talladega County Board of Education et al
as 2:2017cv01876
Plaintiff:
T. S.
Defendant:
Talladega County Board of Education, Childersburg Middle School, Suzanne Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Anthony Favors v. Michelle Hoover, et al
as 16-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Hoover, Lucinda Jesson, Daniel Storkamp and others
HENDERSON v. JONES et al
as 4:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HENDERSON
Defendant:
JENA JONES, CREIGHTON, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Favors v. Michelle Hoover, et al
as 14-3705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Hoover, Cal Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson and others
Favors v. Hoover et al
as 0:2013cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant:
Michelle Hoover, Cal Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
