Cases 1 - 10 of 107
United States of America v. Williams (Jackson)
as 25-283
Defendant:
MESSIAH JACKSON, JEREMY WILLIAMS, RANDY JONES and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (White)
as 25-80
Defendant:
OCTAVIOUS GRIFFIN, JEREMY WILLIAMS, THOMAS RODRIGUEZ and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parker v. Humphries et al (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00833
Defendant:
GEORGE HUMPHRIES, JEREMY WILLIAM ROSE and FD&L Transportation, LLC doing business as Catcha Cab Taxi Columbus
Plaintiff:
YVONNE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
United States of America v. Williams (Markell Williams)
as 24-3150
Defendant:
Two, 15, MARKELL WILLIAMS and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EQR-2850 Kelvin LP v. Jeremy Williams et al
as 8:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
EQR-2850 Kelvin LP
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 inclusive and Jeremy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Batista v Williams
as 1:2023cv02028
Plaintiff:
Devon Batista
Defendant:
Jeremy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33872
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company v. Williams, Jr
as 4:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeremy Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28775
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
