Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Miller et al v. Gojo Industries, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00562
Plaintiff:
Miller, Jasmine Wilder, Matthew Downing and others
Defendant:
Gojo Industries, Inc. d/b/a Purell and Gojo Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel v. Stirling et al
as 1:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jerome McDaniel
Defendant:
Bryan L. Stirling , Larry Cartledge , Sgt. Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McDaniel v. Cartledge et al
as 1:2012cv02531
Plaintiff:
Jerome McDaniel
Defendant:
L Cartledge, D Bush, Ms McClendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Horn et al
as 4:2012cv01839
Plaintiff:
Jerome McDaniels
Defendant:
Horn, Sgt Wilson and Ofc Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton McDaniel v. Gibbons, et al
as 10-15281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON JEROME MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
GIBBONS, Judge, Correctional Officer, BOHANAN, Correctional Officer, HAMLIN, Dr. and others
McDaniel v. Smith et al
as 2:2009cv02170
Plaintiff:
Clifton Jerome McDaniel
Defendant:
D Smith, - Gilliam, Lasane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton McDaniel v. J. Layman, et al
as 09-16093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON JEROME MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
J. LAYMAN, D. HIGHTMAN, APPLEBERRY and others
Clifton McDaniel v. Gibbons, et al
as 08-17748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON JEROME MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
GIBBONS, Correctional Officer, BOHANON, Correctional Officer, R. REYNOLDS, Correctional Officer and others
Clifton McDaniel v. Gibbons, et al
as 08-16451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON JEROME MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
GIBBONS, Judge, Correctional Officer, BOHANAN, Correctional Officer, HAMLIN, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
