Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jerry Bainbridge, et al v. Director of the Florida Division of Alcoholic Beve
as 22-10525
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY BAINBRIDGE, FAYE BAINBRIDGE, GENE BRETOI and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTOR OF THE FLORIDA DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Heusner v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2015cv01845
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Jerry Bainbridge, Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Heusner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ocasio v. Stubbs et al
as 2:2011cv01131
Defendant:
Jerry Bainbridge and Thomas Stubbs
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ocasio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell Cohen v. Jerry Bainbridge, et al
as 09-15244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL DAVID COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY BAINBRIDGE, GREG COX, JACKIE CRAWFORD and others
NOT USED
as 2:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Padilla v. State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00419
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOT USED
as 2:2007cv01405
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Jackie Crawford, E. K. McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan E. Hadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ryan E. Hadley v. State of Nevada, et al
as 3:2007cv00495
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Jackie Crawford, E. K. McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan E. Hadley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. Bainbridge et al
as 3:2006cv00587
Plaintiff:
Russell Cohen
Defendant:
Jerry Bainbridge, Charles E. Coleman, Jr., Ronald Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
