Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WATSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00353
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES and KELLEY BROWN
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv02365
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD JOHN TRUMP, JOSEPH DUNFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2017cv01951
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. ALLEN , ROBERT TOWNS , STEVEN SMALLWOOD and others
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN, BRIAN HAWKINS and DAVID J. SHULKIN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
ALLEN et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00969
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. ALLEN , LUIS A. RODRIGUEZ-SOTO , STEVEN SMALLWOOD and others
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN, BRIAN HAWKINS, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GAY v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2014cv01379
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EARL GAY
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY BROWN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLIN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2014cv01391
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY BROWN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2014cv01390
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY BROWN and KAMALA HARRIS
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS G. HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRASURE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2014cv01385
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY BROWN and KAMALA HARRIS
Plaintiff:
SPENCER R. BRASURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUFF v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2014cv01392
Plaintiff:
DEWEY JOE DUFF
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY BROWN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLET v. BROWN
as 1:2011mc00065
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HAMLET
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
