Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-2217
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
United States of America v. Smith
as 20-4190
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany, Jerry Slaughter, AKA Hood and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny
Slaughter v. Mahar
as 5:2019cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jerry Slaughter
Defendant:
Colin Mahar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Slaughter et al v. Coloplast Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv21939
Plaintiff:
Rose Slaughter and Jerry Slaughter
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Smith (Slaughter)
as 11-1867
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Reddell Smith, AKA Renny, Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jerry Slaughter, AKA Hood
United States of America v. Smith
as 11-880
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Reddell Smith, Clinton Hill, Jermaine Barnum and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith Horton, AKA Kizza
United States of America v. Scott
as 10-5039
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Reddell Smith, AKA Renny, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Marquise Scott, AKA Sem
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
