Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Webster v. South Arkansas Youth Services Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Webster
Defendant:
South Arkansas Youth Services Inc and Jerry Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MADISON v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv07012
Petitioner:
ALFONZO EDWARD MADISON
Respondent:
JERRY WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Bennett v. Walsh
as 3:2011cv02286
Petitioner:
Edward Bennett
Respondent:
Jerry Walsh and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Juston Boyle v. Ransom, et al
as 11-2831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTON BAYARD BOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANSOM, SGT., R. J. BATH, C.O., J. MATELLO, C.O. and others
BILAL v. WALSH et al
as 2:2011cv01973
Petitioner:
NAFIS BILAL
Respondent:
JERRY WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05847
Defendant:
City of New York, DiPolo, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyle v. Klopotoski, et al
as 10-3635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTON BOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, JERRY WALSH, VINCENT MOONEY and others
Boyle v. Ransom et al
as 3:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Juston Bayard Boyle
Defendant:
Ransom, R. J. Bath, J. Matello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
