Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Frisard's Transportation v. LABR
as 24-30223
Plaintiff:
Frisard's Transportation, L.L.C., Louisiana Motor Transport Association, Incorporated, A & B Group, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Jessica Looman, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division and others
Frisard's Transporation, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Frisard's Transporation, L.L.C., Louisiana Motor Transport Association, Incorporated, A & B Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Julie Su, Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Biden
as 23-40671
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant:
President Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Department of Labor, Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor and others
Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas, Inc. et al v. Su et al
as 1:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas, Inc. and Associated Builders and Contractors
Defendant:
Julie Su, Principal Deputy Adm Jessica Looman, United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rest Law Ctr v. LABR
as 23-50565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Restaurant Law Center and Texas Restaurant Association
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Labor, Honorable Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor and Jessica Looman, Acting Administrator of the Department of Labors Wage and Hour Division, in her official capacity
Rest Law Center v. LABR
as 23-50562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Restaurant Law Center and Texas Restaurant Association
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Labor, Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and Jessica Looman, Acting Administrator of the Department of Labors Wage and Hour Division, in her official capacity
Alpha Services LLC et al v. Looman et al
as 2:2023cv02988
Plaintiff:
Alpha Services LLC, Robert Zaharie, Norterra Services, LLC and others
Defendant:
Jessica Looman and Julie Su
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Teche Vermilion Sugar Cane Growers Association Inc et al v. Su, Julie A et al
as 6:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Teche Vermilion Sugar Cane Growers Association, Inc., Cora Texas Growers and Harvesters Agricultural Association, Inc., American Sugar Cane League and others
Defendant:
Su, Julie A., Acting Secretary of Labor, in her official capacity, Parton, Brent, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor, in his official capacity, Pasternak, Brian, Administrator of the Employment and Training Administration, Office of Foreign Labor Certification, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jesus Ignacio Diaz Castro, Ricardo Guadalupe Arce Ruiz, James Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Coalition v. Walsh
as 22-40316
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Coalition for Workforce Innovation, Associated Builders and Contractors and Southeast Texas, Associated Builders and Contractors, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Marty J. Walsh, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Jessica Looman, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Administrator, Division of Wage and Hour and United States Department of Labor
BCFS Hlth and Human Svcs v. LABR
as 22-50361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BCFS Health and Human Services
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Labor, Marty J. Walsh, Secretary, Jessica Looman, Acting Administrator Wage and Hour Division, in her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
