Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jessie Lewis v. United States District Court for the District of A, et al
as 22-15753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSIE LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, JAMES A. TEILBORG, Judge, DEBRA D. LUCAS, Clerk of Court and others
Lewis v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lewis
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Arizona, James A Teilborg, Debra D Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv09305
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lewis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2019cv05607
Defendant:
Dusten Mullen, Arizona, State of, Mark Brnovich and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. DeRose
as 2:2019cv04814
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lewis
Defendant:
Chris DeRose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessie Lewis v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-15318
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSIE LEWIS, AKA Lewis Jessie
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jessie Lewis v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-15042
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSIE LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Lewis v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00037
Petitioner:
Jessie Lewis
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00220
Petitioner:
Jessie Lewis
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03811
Plaintiff:
Shelia Baker, Linda Barnes, Marita Berry and others
Defendant:
Does 1-50, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
