Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Flores, Jr. v. USA
as 2:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jesus Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. De Jesus-Flores
as 23-40291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ismael De Jesus-Flores
De Jesus-Flores v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Ismael De Jesus-Flores
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flores v. USA
as 2:2022cv03660
Petitioner:
Jesus Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flores #167621 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01299
Defendant:
Unknown Ulibarri, Sandra Farr, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Julien Jesus Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesus Flores v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 16-4052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
FLORES v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2016cv05247
Petitioner:
JESUS FLORES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LEHIGH COUNTY, PA and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Attorney General for the Commonwealth of PA; et al
as 1:2016cv01740
Petitioner:
Jesus Flores
Respondent:
Attorney General for the Commonwealth of PA, District Attorney for Lehigh County, PA and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Hendrix et al
as 1:2016cv06612
Plaintiff:
Jesus Flores
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and D.J. Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores #167621 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00070
Petitioner:
Julien Jesus Flores
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
