Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez
as 17-725
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Jesus Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Miguel Cerda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Manganzon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, AKA Shorty
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez (Sanjurjo)
as 14-2671
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, agent of Shorty, Jesus Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Miguel Cerda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Manganzon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Miguel Cantres-Sanjurjo
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez (Pimentel)
as 14-1731
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, agent of Shorty, Jesus Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Miguel Cerda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Manganzon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ricardo Pimentel, AKA Scarface, AKA Richardo Pimentel, AKA Zook
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez (Fernandez)
as 14-1043
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, agent of Shorty, Jesus Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Miguel Cerda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Manganzon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez (Betancourt)
as 14-922
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, agent of Shorty, Jesus Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Miguel Cerda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Manganzon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Betancourt, AKA Sealed Defendant 5 and Daniel Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
