Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bi Zhang v. IRS
as 20-1453
Petitioner / Appellant:
BI JIAN ZHANG
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WU et al v. 307 ELIZABETH AVE LLC et al
as 2:2019cv15837
Defendant:
MIMI CHIN, 307 ELIZABETH AVE LLC and MIMI CHIN BAND
Plaintiff:
XIANWEI WU, JIAN ZHANG and XIANYING WU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jack Smith v. Harry Oreol, et al
as 19-55855
Defendant:
MURAD WADSWORTH, Psychiatrist, in his/her official capacity and individual capacity, JYOTILA SINGH, Psychiatrist, in his/her official and individual capacity, MERCY POULSON, Nurse, individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK ROBERT SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JESSE HENDERSON, Psychiatric Technician, in his/her official and individual capacity
R Alexander Acosta v. China Palace, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00594
Defendant:
Miao Hui Zhang, Jian Zhang and China Palace, Inc.
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv09799
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Zhang et al v. Osaka Steakhouse & Sushi, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08659
Plaintiff:
En Rong Zhang and Jian Zhang
Defendant:
Chun Chen, "John" Chen #2, "Jane" Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06623
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
ZHANG v. CHONGQING LIUYISHOU GOURMET NJ INC et al
as 2:2018cv10359
Plaintiff:
JIAN ZHANG
Defendant:
CHONGQING LIUYISHOU GOURMET NJ INC, WEIBAINIAN GOURMET INC, YUE MA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
