Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Loggins v. Marshall
as 23-1405
Plaintiff:
VINCENT E. LOGGINS
Defendant:
JILL MARSHALL, MPH, Chief Executive Officer
Fuller v. Marshall, et al
as 1:2023cv01066
Petitioner:
Amelya S Fuller
Defendant:
No Named Respondent
Respondent:
Jill Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Licerio v. Grise et al
as 1:2022cv02965
Plaintiff:
Johnny Licerio
Defendant:
Matthew Grise, Katie Telfer, Jill Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirchner v. Marshall et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Jesse Dillon Kirchner
Defendant:
Jill Marshall and Jefferson County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. MCCollum et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stephens
Defendant:
John Musso, Graham Hoffman, Michael McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillotson v. Marshall
as 1:2021cv03485
Petitioner:
Chris Tillotson
Respondent:
Jill Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Kirchner
as 21-1257
Petitioner:
JESSE DILLION KIRCHNER
Respondent:
JILL MARSHALL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Kirchner v. Marshall et al
as 1:2021cv01809
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Jill Marshall
Petitioner:
Jesse Dillon Kirchner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254
Webster v. Padilla et al
as 1:2020cv03303
Defendant:
John Masso, Jill Marshall, Nancy Bensik and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv15469
Plaintiff:
JILL MARSHALL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
