Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gant v. Arnott
as 1:2025cv00094
Petitioner:
Torey Dedmond Gant
Respondent:
Sheriff Jim C. Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gant v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Defendant:
Agent Andre, Daniel Hughes and Sheriff Jim C. Arnott
Plaintiff:
Torey Dedmond Gant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01603
Plaintiff:
Torey Dedmond Gant
Defendant:
Agent Andre, Daniel Hughes and Jim C. Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Hughes et al
as 6:2024cv03330
Plaintiff:
Torey Dedmond Gant
Defendant:
Daniel Hughes, Agent Andre and Jim C. Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durell et al v. Barnes et al
as 6:2023cv03382
Plaintiff:
Brid Durell and Aaron Cody White
Defendant:
OFC Brett Barnes, OFC J. Carter, Sheriff Jim C. Arnott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Arnott et al
as 6:2021cv03028
Defendant:
Jim C. Arnott, Greene County Jail Mental Health Department and McGreevey
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bradly Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fittro v. Arnott et al

as 6:2020cv03164
Defendant:
Dr. Jason Wilkens, Sheriff Brad Cole, Sheriff Jim C. Arnott and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Todd Fittro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joshua Rideout v. Eric Holder, et al
as 09-3303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joshua J. Rideout
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Holder, United States Attorney General, Michael Wren Reap, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, Chris Koster, Attorney General of Missouri and others
Rideout v. Holder et al

as 1:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jackson Rideout
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Michael W. Reap, Chris Koster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.