Cases 1 - 10 of 24
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, ELIZABETH KAY DILLON, U.S. Judge and others
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division, Elizabeth Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Muriel Pitney
as 22-7044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MURIEL-THERESA PITNEY, Clerk, DONALD LEMONS, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia, BETH COBELL, Sussex I State Prison Warden and others
Meyers v. Pitney et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Muriel Pitney, Donald Lemons, Beth Cobell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Edmonds et al
as 2:2021cv00462
Plaintiff:
Dejon Smith
Defendant:
Larry T. Edmonds, Darrell L. Miller, Sr., E. Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Director of Action Alliance Commonwealth of VAPREA
as 21-6672
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER BROWN, SXI Intel Officer, PEODE, SX1 Physician, MAJOR RUFFIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Brown
as 21-6669
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DIAL, A. WELLINTON, UNIT MANAGER J. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Mosley
as 21-6670
Defendant / Appellee:
GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR MOSLEY, SERGEANT DIAL, MS. DARBY, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Sharpe v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00636
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Chapp Whitt, Jim Parks and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Sean Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
