Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Downs v. Leffner et al
as 2:2012cv00326
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Lee Griggs, Margaret Leffner and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Earl Downs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jimmy Downs v. James Baca, et al
as 11-16496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY EARL DOWNS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BACA, ADAM WATSON, CHRISTINE NAPOLITANO and others
Jimmy Downs v. Howard Skolnick, et al
as 11-15697
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY EARL DOWNS
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNICK, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jimmy Downs v. James Baca, et al
as 10-17860
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY EARL DOWNS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BACA, ADAM WATSON, CHRISTINE NAPOLITANO and others
Downs v. Williams et al
as 2:2010cv01444
Respondent:
Attorney General of Nevada and Brian E. Williams, Sr.
Petitioner:
Jimmy Earl Downs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jimmy Downs v. Lenard Vare, et al
as 10-15624
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY EARL DOWNS
Respondent - Appellee:
LENARD VARE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Downs v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2009cv01891
Petitioner:
Jimmy Earl Downs
Respondent:
Howard Skolnik and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Downs v. Baca et al
as 3:2009cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Earl Downs
Defendant:
James Baca and Adam Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nevada Department of Correctio v. Jimmy Downs, et al
as 09-15753
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMY EARL DOWNS
Defendant:
RUSSELL DAVID COHEN, TRAVERS ARTHUR GREENE and PAUL L. BROWNING
NDOC v. Russell Cohen, et al
as 08-17091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant - Appellant:
TRAVERS ARTHUR GREENE and PAUL L. BROWNING
Defendant:
RUSSELL DAVID COHEN and JIMMY EARL DOWNS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
