Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Dillion v. Martin, Jr. et al
as 2:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dillion
Defendant:
Jimmie Martin, Jr., Argie Mark, Jr., National Fire & Marine Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Martin, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brooks v. Robinson, et al
as 22-6057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED BROOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA ROBINSON, SHIRLEY MAY and JIMMY MARTIN
Simpson v. Martin, et al
as 21-6104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LAROY SIMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY MARTIN, in official capacity as Warden/Facility Head/Leader of All North Fork Prison Employees/Staff, PAULA BEATHA, in official capacity as North Fork Prison's Law Library Supervisor Employeed as "Legal Mail, Legal Filings Monitor, Constitutional Violator, Delayer of legal process, SHIRLEY MAY, Prison's Medical CHSA, in her official capacity and others
Draper v. Martin et al
as 5:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
Jamar J Draper
Defendant:
Warden Jimmy Martin, FNU Zender and FNU Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farris v. Martin, et al
as 21-6086
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYRONE LESLIE FARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
JIMMY MARTIN, Warden of North Fork Corrections and JOE ALLBAUGH, Director of the Department of Corrections
Farris v. Martin, et al
as 21-6077
Petitioner / Appellant:
TYRONE LESLIE FARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
JIMMY MARTIN, Warden of North Fork Corrections and JOE ALLBAUGH, Director of the Department of Corrections
Strickland v. Martin
as 21-6051
Respondent / Appellee:
JIMMY MARTIN
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT STRICKLAND
Lute v Martin
as 5:2021cv00354
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
Chad Andrew Lute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
