Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WANG v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv02974
Plaintiff:
JIN WANG
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wang v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01388
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jin WANG
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Pineda
as 21-3037
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yunfeng Gao, AKA George, Si En Li, AKA Ah Li, Ting Li, AKA Ting Ting, AKA Vicky and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Pineda, AKA Ant
United States of America v. Pinelda (Yuan Li)
as 21-1829
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Pinelda, AKA Ant, Yunfeng Gao, AKA George, Si En Li, AKA Ah Li and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Yuan Li
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03923
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00034
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00035
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00033
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
