Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sherman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sherman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv23406
Plaintiff:
Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sherman v. Reisig et al
as 2:2010cv02939
Plaintiff:
Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Jeff Reisig, Dave Henderson, Alvina Tzang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Sherman v. Jeffrey Davi, et al
as 09-17100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE SHERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY DAVI and CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONER
Joseph Sherman v. California Attorney General, et al
as 09-16859
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE SHERMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF and YOLO COUNTY CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER
Sherman v. Cheung et al
as 2:2009cv01783
Plaintiff:
Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Caleb Cheung, Dale Hanssen and Dan Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Joseph Sherman v. Yolo County Sheriff
as 09-15258
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE SHERMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF
Joe Sherman v. Yolo County Chief Probation Of, et al
as 08-17776
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE SHERMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Joseph Sherman v. Yolo County Chief Probation Of, et al
as 08-17652
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE SHERMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Joseph Sherman v. Yolo County Chief Probation Of, et al
as 08-17549
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE SHERMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER, YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
