Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams, et al
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Muckle v. US, et al
as 10-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL L. MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARACK OBAMA and others
Burton v. Tyler et al
as 1:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Justin Alan Burton
Defendant:
Chris Tyler, Mike Hill, William Yurcina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muckle et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv10678
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Muckle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dean v. Rider et al.
as 2:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean
Defendant:
C. J. Rider, David Ballard, Thomas McBride and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Motto v. Rider et al
as 5:2007cv00627
Plaintiff:
Michael Motto
Defendant:
C. J. Rider, Thomas McBride, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson, et al.
as 2:2007cv00578
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Robert C. Byrd, John D. Rockefeller, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kostenko v. Ranavaya
as 5:2007cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Merritt Kostenko
Defendant:
Mohammad Ranavaya, James B. Becker, Christopher J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
